Community Bankers' Advisor

i  October, 2002

Page 2  


Few of the victims who contacted the FTC personally knew the person who had stolen and misused their identity. These relationships include family members, friends, neighbors, roommates, and associates from the victim’s workplace. Other victims, while they did not know the suspect personally, recalled an event or incident that they believe led to the identity theft. Most typical was theft of a wallet or purse, but others reported theft of information from financial records and obtaining information from financial institutions. Not surprisingly, most victims do not know how the identity thief obtained their information. That being the case, what can financial institutions do to protect themselves and their customers? The best defense is to know how the schemes work and train staff to exercise caution.

Identity Assumption

Identity assumption in check fraud occurs when criminals learn information about a financial institution customer, such as name, address, financial institution account number, social security number, home and work telephone numbers, or employer, and use the information to misrepresent themselves as the real customer. These schemes may involve changing account information, creating fictitious transactions between unsuspecting parties, or preparing checks drawn on the valid account that are presented using false identification. This fraud is made easier when organizations, such as the departments of motor vehicles, use social security numbers on drivers’ licenses as identification. In North Dakota, because those numbers are more available, financial institutions (and customers) must be especially careful. (Effective January 1, 2002, N.D.C.C. § 39-06-14 requires the removal of the social security number from the actual driver license, unless the driver requests the use of their social security number.)

Example: A financial institution customer pays a bill in the normal course of business. An employee of the payee copies the check and provides it to a partner in crime who contacts the financial institution and, using information from the check, pretends to be the account holder. The criminal tells the financial institution that he or she has moved and needs new checks sent to the new address quickly. When the financial institution complies, the forged checks are written against the customer’s account.

 

Example: A burglar steals a statement for an account at financial institution A, and a co-conspirator steals a box of new checks for a different person’s account at financial institution B. They prepare the stolen checks to be payable to the valid account at financial institution A. Using fraudulent identification, one of the criminals poses as the payee to cash the checks at drive-through windows at financial institution A. Because the criminals know that sufficient cash exists in the account to cover the check, they can ask safely for immediate cash.

Example: A criminal uses customer information, sometimes from a financial institution insider, to order checks from a check printer or to create counterfeit checks and false identification. The criminal then writes fraudulent checks and presents them for deposit into the customer’s account, requesting part of the deposit back in cash. The cash-out from the transaction represents the proceeds of the crime. This is also known as a split-deposit scheme.

Identity assumption schemes can be successful when a financial institution:

• Accepts account changes over the telephone;

• Is careless in requiring and reviewing identification presented for

• Does not limit the size of cash transactions, especially at drive-through windows.

To protect against such frauds, financial institutions should ensure that changes to accounts are secure, by requiring customers to request changes in writing (or in some other way, such as password identification) so there is some guarantee of the identity of the customer, and train personnel, including all tellers, to:

(1) Check identification carefully, particularly
(2) Require two forms of identification;
(3) Record the identification information on the back of the item presented;
(4) Inspect checks carefully to ensure that they are not counterfeit

Previous PageNext Page


Gold Bard

Firm Profile | Attorneys | Newsletter | State Government | Links | Contact Us | Home

Copyright 1998-2002 Olson & Burns, P.C., all rights reserved.
This website is presented for information purposes only and is not intended to provide legal advice.