Community Bankers' Advisor

December, 1998 - Vol. 5, No.6 i

 Page 1  

Welcome to the on-line
December issue of the
Community Bankers' Advisor
. . . . . . . . . . .

The Advisor is prepared by attorneys at Olson & Burns, P.C. to provide information pertaining to legal developments affecting the field of banking. In order to accomplish this objective, we welcome any comments our readers have regarding the content and format of this publication. Please address your comments to:

Community Bankers' Advisor
c/o Olson & Burns, P.C.
PO Box 1180
Minot, ND 58702-1180
email:
Olson & Burns P.C.

The attorneys at Olson & Burns represent a wide range of clients in the financial and commercial areas. Our attorneys have expertise in banking regulations, employment law, bank charter issues, bankruptcy, commercial paper, real estate, probate, and UCC matters.

Independent Community Banks of North Dakota

You are asking . . .

Q. What is the basic difference between a guaranty of payment and one of collection?

A. The courts distinguish a "guaranty of payment" as opposed to a "guaranty of collection." The basic difference between a guaranty of payment and a guaranty of collection is that in a guaranty of payment, the guarantor undertakes unconditionally that the borrower will pay, and the lender may, upon default, proceed directly against the guarantor without taking any step to collect the debt from principal. With a guaranty of collection, there is some condition precedent to the liability of the guarantor. Typically, the condition is that if the debt cannot be collected by legal proceedings, the guarantor will pay, and so legal action against the principal and a failure to collect from him through foreclosure are conditions precedent to the liability of the guarantor. A guarantor of payment is liable to the guarantee immediately upon the default of the principal and without a demand or notice.

Q. If we should use this particular item as collateral for a loan, how is a security interest in life insurance proceeds perfected in North Dakota?

A. N.D.C.C. § 26.1-33-33 provides that a life insurance policy may be assigned to any person, and that person may recover upon the policy in accordance with the terms of the policy. N.D.C.C. § 41-09-04(7) (U.C.C. § 9-104) excludes the application of the Uniform Commercial Code to the transfer of an interest in an insurance policy, meaning that a lender cannot simply file a U.C.C. - 1 to perfect that security interest. The security interest in an insurance policy may only be "perfected" by obtaining the acknowledgment of the insurer to the assignment. We recommend that before attempting to use proceeds in a life insurance policy as collateral, the creditor should first establish that the policy has not been canceled, and then verify that no prior assignments of the policy are on record with the insurer.

Next Page

Gold Bard

Firm Profile | Attorneys | State Government | Links | Contact Us | Home

Copyright 1998-2000 Olson & Burns, P.C., all rights reserved.
This website is presented for information purposes only and is not intended
to provide legal advice. Site designed and maintained by yaya productions.